Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Nesmith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 30, 1933No. 8 Div. 478Published

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

When sections 3243 and 3244 of the Code are construed in the light of section 3237 and sections 5288, 5290, the legislative intent is clear to this effect, that where a defendant is convicted for a misdemeanor and appeals from the judgment of conviction, he is entitled, as of right, to have the execution of the judgment suspended pending the appeal ; but if he desires to preserve his right to discharge his liability by paying the fine and costs, he must confess judgment therefor with sufficient sureties, as provided by section 3244 of the Code. If he does not so secure the fine…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burke v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Nunnally Co. v. Bromberg & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Ex Parte MancilSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API