MCS LaserTec, Inc. v. Kaminski

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Kam Companies, Inc. ("Kam") and MCS LaserTece, Inc. (collectively "the plaintiffs") appeal from the trial court's partial grant of their Motion to Correct Error on their criminal conversion claim. The plaintiffs present two issues for our review, which we restate as:

1. Whether the trial court erred when it determined that Kaminski erimi-nally converted only five of the disputed 198 payments.

2. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to a new trial because Kaminski testified falsely at trial.

Kaminski cross-appeals, arguing that the plaintiffs' motion was…