Legal Opinion
Ruse v. Bleeke
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 29, 2009No. 02A04-0902-CV-115PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.
In this consolidated appeal, Scott Ruse ("Ruse") appeals after a bench trial from the trial court's judgment in favor of Mark Bleeke ("Bleeke") in his action against Ruse alleging claims under the Indiana Crime Victim's Relief Act, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty. Ruse also ap peals after a bench trial from the trial court's judgment in favor of Terry Parrish ("Parrish") in an action brought by Ruse against Parrish alleging breach of contract and criminal conversion. The broad issue presented for our review from these judgments is whether there is sufficient evidence…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bilimoria Computer Systems, LLC v. America Online, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Tobin v. RumanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Lawlis v. Kightlinger & GrayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- White v. Indiana Realty Associates IIIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- SJS Refractory Co. v. Empire Refractory Sales, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Thomas Rosenbaum v. Beau WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. v. Marsh Supermarkets, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Clark v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Meridian Security Insurance Co. v. Hoffman Adjustment Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.