Legal Opinion

Cleminshaw v. Beech Aircraft Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 19, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 1667PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALEB M. WRIGHT, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion under Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 37(a), 28 U.S.C., to compel further answers to certain of defendant’s interrogatories served on plaintiff January 12, 1955 and December 8, 1955, pursuant to F.R.C.P. rule 33. An order, Issued on December 2, 1957, disposed of several of the matters under consideration. The court’s attention, therefore, is directed solely to the disputed interrogatories, hereafter referred to by numbers. Specifically, they are movant’s *301numbers 97, 99, 105, 106, 107, 110, 113, 114, 124 and 126.1

Questi…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Bohlin v. Brass Rail, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  3. Cary v. HardyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1940
  4. Siegel v. YatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sierra Berdecía v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
  2. Cargill, Inc. v. Ron Burge Trucking, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  3. B. & S. Drilling Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1959
  4. United States v. One 1964 Cadillac Coupe DeVilleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  5. Rosado v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API