Legal Opinion
Bohlin v. Brass Rail, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 10, 1957PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYAN, District Judge.
Defendant moves pursuant to Rule 37, Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C.A., to compel the plaintiffs to answer certain interrogatories propounded by defendant, and for further relief in the event plaintiffs fail to do so.
Defendant served 21 interrogatories on the plaintiffs on August 11, 1956, requiring answers within 15 days as provided by Rule 33, F.R.C.P. No objections were served by plaintiffs to any of the interrogatories within the ten days *225provided by Rule 33, or indeed at any time, nor was any application made to enlarge the time within which answers should be made.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sher v. De HavenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Munzer v. Swedish American LineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Cary v. HardyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1940
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sierra Berdecía v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Independent Insulating Glass/Southwest, Inc. v. StreetCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Cooey v. StricklandDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- Cargill, Inc. v. Ron Burge Trucking, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.