Legal Opinion
Cary v. Hardy
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided July 19, 1940No. 12PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DARR, District Judge.
On Objections to Interrogatories.
Under authority of Rule 33, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the plaintiff filed interrogatories to be propounded to the defendants, Mrs. Richard Hardy and Ellis C. Soper.
The service of the interrogatories on both defendants was had on November 10, 1939. Mrs. Hardy did not answer the interrogatories and made objections to certain ones, which objections were filed on March 6, 1940. Mr. Soper answered a portion of the interrogatories and filed the answers thereto, and filed objections to the others on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kraus v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Barnsdall Refining Corporation v. Birnamwood Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1940
- Missouri ex rel. De Vault v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- United States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1940
- Munzer v. Swedish American LineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sierra Berdecía v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
- Robert L. Brewster v. North American Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Bohlin v. Brass Rail, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Cleminshaw v. Beech Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1957
- Maurer-Neuer, Inc. v. United Packinghouse WorkersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.