Legal Opinion

B. & S. Drilling Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided June 4, 1959No. 11148PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INGRAHAM, District Judge.

Interrogatories have been filed under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. by defendant, and plaintiff has filed its objections thereto.

In Interrogatories Nos. 1 and 2 defendant requests plaintiff to state “in what respect you contend this defendant was negligent” in bringing about the losses sued for, including the names of the employees of defendant who plaintiff contends were so negligent, the acts and omissions that plaintiff contends constitute negligence, and the names, addresses, or locations of each of the witnesses from whom plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. V. D. Anderson Co. v. Helena Cotton Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1953
  3. Hornung v. Eastern Auto. Forwarding Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1951
  4. Cleminshaw v. Beech Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1957
  5. Mall Tool Co. v. Sterling Varnish Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stonybrook Tenants Ass'n v. AlpertDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
  2. United States v. National Steel Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1960
  3. State Ex Rel. Pete Rhodes Supply Co. v. CrainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. Meunier v. OgurekCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  5. Struthers Scientific & International Corp. v. General Foods Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API