Drabant v. Cure
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
This is a curious and most unsatisfactory record. The court below first entered a judgment for defendant, upon the ground that certain questions of law, raised in the affidavit of defense, were conclusive against plaintiff’s right to recover. After the expiration of the term at which the judgment was entered, but within the six months allowed for an appeal therefrom, it granted a rule to show cause why that judgment should not be vacated. On its hearing, without filing an opinion, it made the rule absolute nunc pro tunc, vacated the judgment and allowed defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rhodes v. TerheydenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Knobeloch v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- G. B. Hurt, Inc. v. Fuller Canneries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Musser Forests, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Gray v. Phila. & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Davis v. Investment Land Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Rudman Et Ux. v. City of ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Long v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.