Legal Opinion

G. B. Hurt, Inc. v. Fuller Canneries Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1919No. Appeal, No. 75PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal, No. 75, Oct. T., 1918, by defendant, from order of O. P. Allegheny Co., July T., 1917, No. 2208, discharging rule to dissolve a writ of foreign attachment in the case of G. B. Hurt, Inc., v. Fuller Canneries Company, a Corporation, appellant. Buie to dissolve foreign attachment. Before Swearingen, J. The facts appear in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 75, Oct. T., 1918, by defendant, from order of O. P. Allegheny Co., July T., 1917, No. 2208, discharging rule to dissolve a writ of foreign attachment in the case of G. B. Hurt, Inc., v. Fuller Canneries Company, a Corporation, appellant. Buie to dissolve foreign attachment. Before Swearingen, J. The facts appear in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Errors assigned were allowing amendments to plaintiffs statement of claim, and the order of the court discharging the rule to dissolve attachment. Failure to attach the contracts to the statement of claim was a.defect that could not be…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Fox,

The G. B. Hurt, Inc., issued a writ of foreign attachment in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County against the Fuller Canneries Company to recover the sum of $2,681.25, and attached in its own hands the sum of $1,428.97, being the amount of a judgment obtained by the Fuller company against G. B. Hurt, Inc., in a suit in the county court of Allegheny County. An appearance was entered by the Fuller company, de bene esse, in this attachment, and a motion was made to quash the writ and dissolve the attachment. The grounds of the motion were, first, that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Armstrong & Latta v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Weiskircher v. ConnellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Commonwealth v. A. B. Baxter & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Schueck v. FreemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Hanscom v. ChapinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Henes v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Pasquinelli v. Southern Macaroni Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Atlas Portland Cement Co. v. American Brick & Clay Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Parsons Trading Co. v. DohanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Sullivan v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API