Legal Opinion

Davis v. Investment Land Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1929No. Appeal, 61PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

To plaintiffs’ statement of claim, defendant, under the authority of section 20 of the Practice Act of May 14, 1915, P. L. 483, 486, filed an affidavit of defense raising questions of law; this was sustained by the court below and a judgment entered for defendant, from which plaintiffs now appeal. In determining whether or not such a judgment should be or should have been entered, two rules must always be applied: (1) The question to be decided is not whether the statement of claim is so clear in both form and specification as to entitle plaintiff to proceed to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. TerheydenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. King Et Al., Appellants, v. BrillhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Gray v. Phila. & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Steel v. LevySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Birl v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Sullivan v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Hyam v. Upper Montgomery Joint AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Sun Ray Drug Co. v. LawlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API