Legal Opinion

Eiseman v. Pennsylvania R.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 5, 1945No. 8698PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff, the widow and executrix of Louis Eiseman, a conductor of a shifting crew employed by the defendant railroad, brought suit under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act and the Safety Appliance Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq. and § 1 et seq., to recover damages for the death of her husband which resulted from an accident at the 52nd Street classification yard of the defendant at Philadelphia. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, answering certain interrogatories stated and discussed hereinafter. The court below entered a judgment n.o.v. for the defendant1…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union Pac. R. v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. State v. Manchester & Lawrence RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1873

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. John F. Kennedy v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, and Third-Party v. United States Steel Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  2. Cheffey v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. GolayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  4. Patrick v. MoormanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Vigil v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RY. CO.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API