Legal Opinion

Patrick v. Moorman

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DALZELL, District Judge.

Plaintiff Dustin Alphanso Patrick (“Patrick”) sues defendant Deputy Sheriff Michael Moorman (“Moorman”), asserting a single claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 of excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Patrick’s suit arises out of an incident in which he robbed a bank and then fled from the scene and attempted to elude pursuing police officers. During Patrick’s flight, Moorman shot Patrick with his Taser, causing Patrick to fall to the ground and sustain serious injuries.

Moorman has filed a motion for summary judgment in which he argues that (1) his…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ward v. NoonanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Bombard v. VolpDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2014
  3. Chris Manwaring v. PA State Trooper Michael Rogers, ET AL.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  4. Nicholas T. Colyer, by his Guardian Amy Jo Druckemiller v. County of Mifflin, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  5. WILLIAMS v. CITY OF LANCASTERDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API