Legal Opinion
Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Golay
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 21, 1946No. Nos. 3195, 3196PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
These are railroad crossing cases. Fred Golay and Ruth Golay, husband and wife, sustained personal injuries as the result of a collision between the automobile in which they were riding and a passenger train of the Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company. Separate actions for damages were instituted. The issues joined were negligence and contributory negligence. The actions were consolidated for trial before the court and a jury, resulting in separate verdicts and judgments for plaintiffs. Defendant appealed, and the cases are here on a single record and were submitted…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Burlie v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- O'Malley v. EaganWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
- Homan v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Pentecost v. St. Louis Merchants Bridge Terminal RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Utah Corporation v. Jimmie Rex LumbertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Interstate Motor Lines, Inc. v. Great Western Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Betty Bush and Her Husband, Eddie Bush v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Lopez v. Southern Pacific Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- McKenna v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.