Legal Opinion
Torrance v. Aames Funding Corp.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 25, 2002No. CIV.02-592-STPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HAGGERTY, Chief Judge.
On August 29, 2002, Magistrate Judge Stewart filed her Amended Find ings and Recommendation recommending defendant’s Motion to Stay Pending Arbitration be denied. Defendant has filed timely objections. Motions to stay proceedings to enforce arbitration provisions are non-dispositive pre-trial matters. See Touton, S.A. v. M.V. Rizcun Trader, 30 F.Supp.2d 508, 509 (E.D.Pa.1998); Herko v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 978 F.Supp. 141, 142-43 n. 1 (W.D.N.Y.1997). The matter is now before the court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a).…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Powershare, Inc. v. Syntel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Walther v. Sovereign BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Salley v. Option One Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.