Legal Opinion

Gunter v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 24, 1930No. [No. 49, April Term, 1930.]PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

The appellant, John E. Gunter, was an employee of Sharp. & Dohme, Inc., engaged in the mixing of bichloride and cyanide powders, and had been so engaged for three years preceding the disability for which he claims compensation. He is suffering from nephritis, or Bright’s disease, which he contends is the result of an accidental injury, the accident alleged being the inhalation of the fumes or dust arising from bichloride of mercury and cyanide of potassium. The Accident Commission had made an award to the claimant, from which, the employer and insurer appealed. At the trial on appeal the only…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. FrancksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Adams v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Peru Plow & Wheel Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Iwanicki v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commercial Union Insurance v. Porter Hayden Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Moore v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  3. Foble v. KnefelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  4. Polomski v. Mayor & City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Schemmel v. T. B. Gatch & Sons Contracting & Building Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API