Legal Opinion
Connelly v. City of Bridgeport
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 5, 1926PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
These actions, brought separately, rest upon the same basis and require the consideration of essentially the same questions. At the request of the parties they were reserved, and by agreement of counsel argued together, and will be so considered in this opinion.
The charter of the city of Bridgeport as revised and amended to September 1st, 1917, provides that there shall be in the city of Bridgeport a tax commissioner, who shall have all the powers and duties exercised by boards of assessors, and shall have authority to appoint a deputy commissioner and a chief clerk, etc. It also provides…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Cook County National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- State ex rel. Bulkeley v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- People ex rel. Cant v. CrossleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Glassell Development Co. v. Citizens' Natlional Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- International Business MacHines Corporation v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Keeney v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- City of Stamford v. Town of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Mad River Co. v. Town of WolcottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Lenox Realty Co. v. HackettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.