Legal Opinion
Mad River Co. v. Town of Wolcott
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 15, 1951PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
These two cases are appeals from the board of tax review of the defendant town of Wolcott to the Court of Common Pleas, which reserved them for advice upon the questions appearing in the footnote. 1 Briefly stated, the questions ask whether certain dams owned by the plaintiffs and located in the defendant town are taxable there or in the city, of Waterbury. The cases were argued, and will be considered, together.
The stipulated facts may be summarized as follows: The plaintiffs gave to the assessors of the defendant town lists of the taxable property owned by them on October 1, 1948, but did…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Patterson v. Bark EudoraSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Strathearn Steamship Co. v. DillonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- State v. MuoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Baker v. BaningosoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Baker v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Klapproth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.