Attorney Grievance Commission v. Sinclair
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
In this case we shall disbar an attorney whose neglect resulted in a default judgment in the amount of $100,000 being entered against his client.
Bar Counsel, acting pursuant to the provisions of Maryland Rule BY9, on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission, filed a petition with us seeking disciplinary action against John Howell Sinclair, a member of the Bar of this Court since July 7, 1969. The petition alleged violation of Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1), (4), (5) and (6); 6-101(A)(2) and (3); and 7-101(A)(l), (2) and (3).
Pursuant to Rule BV9 b we referred the matter for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SinclairCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SinclairCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
3Cited by2 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990