Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Sinclair

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 8, 1985No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 16, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a petition for disciplinary action against John Howell Sinclair, alleging violations of the Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility. We referred the matter, pursuant to Maryland Rule BV9 b, to Judge Rich*583ard J. Clark of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. After conducting an evidentiary hearing, Judge Clark filed detailed findings and conclusions as follows:

“Findings of Fact
“1. John Howell Sinclair was admitted as a member of the Bar of the Court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SinclairCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SinclairCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Matter of SinclairDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API