Legal Opinion

Stein v. Brown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1985No. 84-1798PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This appeal presents a case of first impression. The issue is whether appellee, as a will beneficiary, can effectively disclaim his inheritance pursuant to R.C. 1339.60 under the facts herein. The appellate court held that the disclaimer was valid. For the reasons which follow, we disagree.

*307The ambit of authority to disclaim a testamentary succession to real and personal property is contained -within R.C. 1339.60(B). In relation to this appeal, subsection (1) provides:

“A disclaimant, other than a fiduciary under an instrument who is not authorized by the instrument to disclaim the interest of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. WilgusSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Kalt v. YoungworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. The People v. FlanaginIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Schoonover v. OsborneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  5. Matter of Estate of ReedWyoming Supreme Court · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. In Re TaubmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
  2. Rieser v. Hayslip (In Re Canyon Systems Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
  3. Finn v. Alliance BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Katz v. BanningOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Blood v. NofzingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API