Legal Opinion

Connor Timothy Corrigan Phippen v. The State of Wyoming

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2013No. S-12-0157PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[11] After conditionally pleading guilty to possession with intent to deliver marijuana, Connor Timothy Corrigan Phippen challenges the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence discovered during a search of his vehicle. He contends that the drug dog sniff was inconclusive and that the subsequent search of his vehicle was illegal. We affirm, based upon our conclusion that the totality of the circumstances was sufficient to find probable cause.

ISSUE

[12] Phippen presents one issue:

Whether or not the warrantless search of Mr. Phippen's vehicle violated Article I,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Florida v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Flood v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. William L. Witt(074468)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  2. Gibson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  3. The State of Wyoming v. Jason Tsosie JohnWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Grimm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. Keith Allen Beckwith v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API