Legal Opinion

Jackson v. HNS MANAGEMENT CO., INC.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 29, 2008No. AC 28947PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, C. J.

Our appellate process involves a constant balancing of two competing and often conflicting goals, which rub against one another. The first seeks to bring a finality to civil litigation; the second seeks to ensure that where injustice might otherwise result from trial error, reversal and retrial of such a case is appropriate. The second alternative is available only when an adequate record is before us, permitting a conclusion that any error was harmful. The general verdict rule operates when a jury deliberates and returns a general verdict without special interrogatories.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Curry v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Belledeau v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. Tetreault v. EslickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Turturino v. HurleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Green v. YANKEE GAS CORP.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Perez v. CumbaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. Sturgeon v. SturgeonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Brown v. Bridgeport Police Dept.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2015
  5. Kissel v. Center for Women's Health, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API