Jackson v. HNS MANAGEMENT CO., INC.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
Our appellate process involves a constant balancing of two competing and often conflicting goals, which rub against one another. The first seeks to bring a finality to civil litigation; the second seeks to ensure that where injustice might otherwise result from trial error, reversal and retrial of such a case is appropriate. The second alternative is available only when an adequate record is before us, permitting a conclusion that any error was harmful. The general verdict rule operates when a jury deliberates and returns a general verdict without special interrogatories.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Curry v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Belledeau v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Tetreault v. EslickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Turturino v. HurleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
3Cited by5 opinions
- Green v. YANKEE GAS CORP.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Perez v. CumbaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Sturgeon v. SturgeonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Brown v. Bridgeport Police Dept.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Kissel v. Center for Women's Health, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021