Legal Opinion

People v. Stewart

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 13, 1924No. Crim. No. 770PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The defendants, together with one C. J. Driscoll were prosecuted under an indictment returned by the grand jury of the county of Sacramento, charging the crime of criminal syndicalism, as follows, to wit: “The said H. B. Stewart, C. J. Driscoll and Pete Wukusitch on the - day of December, A. D. 1922, at the County of Sacramento, in the State of California, and before the finding of this indictment were and each of them was, then and there willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously and knowingly a member of an organization, society, group, and assemblage of persons known and designated as ‘The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People v. FlanaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. People v. LundquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. People v. EricksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. SalcidoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Pulido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API