Legal Opinion

People v. Lundquist

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1890No. 20614PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

The defendant was tried for murder, convicted of murder in the second degree, and sentenced to imprisonment in the state’s prison for the term of thirty-four years. It appears, from the record, that the defendant, some time before the case was set down for trial, applied to the court below for a commission to take the depositions of witnesses out of the state; and in support of his application filed the following affidavits:—

“John Flournoy, being duly sworn, says: I am an attorney at law. I was, on the seventh day of August, 1888, appointed by Hon. D. J. Toohy, judge of said court, to defend…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. BJB ELECTRIC LP v. BRIDGELUX, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
  3. Langille v. Berthel, Fisher & Company Financial Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. People v. WallachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API