Legal Opinion

White v. Duggan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 24, 1885PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is an action on a probate bond. The following facts are relied on as a defence by the sureties. Having signed another bond which turned out to be wrong in form, they signed this one in blank at their principal’s request, and upon his representation that the penal sum in the former bond ($2000) was satisfactory, and that the new bond was to be for the same amount. The principal filled out the blank with a larger penal sum, and delivered the bond, but subsequently told the sureties that it was in the penal sum of $2000, which they believed until after this action was brought.

It does not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  2. Dair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. State ex rel. McCarty v. PepperIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  4. The People v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  5. Butler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. Inhabitants of ClintonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Benton County Savings Bank of Norway v. BoddickerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. Scollans v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Hanson v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  5. Graham v. MiddlebyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API