Legal Opinion

The People v. . Bostwick

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1865PublishedCited by 41 opinions

The facts in this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of Judge Campbell to enable the profession to understand the principles decided.

1Opinion of the Court

In December, 1855, the commissioners of the canal fund loaned to the Bank of Corning twenty-five thousand dollars. The bond in suit was executed by the defendants as sureties — undertaking and agreeing that the bank should repay the money borrowed. The bond was signed and acknowledged at Corning, and was handed over to Bostwick, who was the president of the bank, with the distinct understanding that it was not to be used until it should be signed by one Andrew B. Dickinson as co-surety. The bond would not have been signed by any of the defendants except Bostwick and Laurin Mallory, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. North American Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  2. Jackson ex dem. Simmons v. ChaseNew York Supreme Court · 1806
  3. Lovett v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  4. Jackson ex dem. Hunter v. PageNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  5. D. C. Bronson v. NoyesNew York Supreme Court · 1831

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Weber v. ChristenIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. State ex rel. McCarty v. PepperIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Benton County Savings Bank of Norway v. BoddickerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  4. State ex rel. Bothrick v. PotterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  5. Quick v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API