Legal Opinion

O'Donnell v. Inhabitants of Clinton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 4, 1888PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is a petition for the assessment of damages caused by taking land for a town way, including damage to the petitioner’s house. Pub. Sts. c. 49, §§ 79, 105. The petitioner before filing his petition had accepted two hundred dollars awarded by the road commissioners, and had set his mark to a receipt prepared by them acknowledging full payment of all claims. The respondent asked a ruling that this settlement was a bar, which was refused, and the respondent excepted.

The petitioner’s evidence tended to show that he could not read, and that the road commissioners knew of his inability; that at…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Litchfield v. HutchinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Chapman v. . RoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Ford v. FordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  4. Mullen v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  5. Trambly v. RicardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Och v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Sokoloff v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Bliss v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  4. Calkins v. Wire Hardware Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Bartlett v. StanchfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API