Rogers v. Kimball
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from an order denying a new trial. George Puterbaugh, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
Appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment in favor of defendants and from an order denying a new trial. The action is by and on behalf of Ella S. Rogers, the real party in interest, joining with her Thomas L. Rogers, her husband, to recover upon a certain contract of indemnity, set forth in the complaint. The complaint, after alleging the death of James S. Gordon, and the appointment of the defendant Jessie Gordon Whittlesey as administratrix of his estate, alleges in substance that on February 25, 1882, the plaintiffs and the defendants, Warren C. Kimball and Moses A. Luce, and said James S.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mondran v. GouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Bryan v. TormeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Upper San Joaquin Irrigating Canal Co. v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by11 opinions
- Weddle v. HeathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Aronson v. Frankfort Accident & Plate Glass InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- W. Ross Campbell Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Gillon v. Northern Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Estes v. HotchkissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.