Legal Opinion

Detroit Lumber Co. v. Auxiliary Yacht "Petrel"

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1909No. Calendar No. 23,219½PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Proceedings under the water-craft law by the Detroit Lumber Company against the auxiliary yacht “Petrel.” There was judgment for defendant, and petitioner brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, C. J.

The proceedings in this case were instituted to, enforce a demand against a water craft, pursuant to the provisions of chapter 298 of the Complied Laws, sections 10788-10836, inclusive. At the conclusion of claimant’s proofs, the circuit judge dismissed the proceedings and awarded judgment in favor of defendant for the reason that claimant had failed to prove that at the time of giving notice of his claim the owners of the craft were indebted to the contractor. Claimant applies to this court for the writ of certiorari to review this judgment.

We are of the opinion that the applicant has…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States Gypsum Co. v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Farrell v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. City of Ishpeming v. MaroneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. In re PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Detroit Lumber Co. v. Auxiliary Yacht "Petrel"Michigan Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re BrewerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hartz v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Detroit Lumber Co. v. Auxiliary Yacht "Petrel."Michigan Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API