Legal Opinion

Detroit Lumber Co. v. Auxiliary Yacht "Petrel"

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1908No. Docket No. 120PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Certiorari to Wayne; Murphy, J. Proceedings under the water-craft law by the Detroit Lumber Company against the auxiliary yacht “Petrel.” There was an order dismissing the proceedings for want of jurisdiction, and claimant brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The proceeding was instituted under the water-craft law, so-called, to recover for certain lumber and materials supplied to the owners and used in the building, fitting out and furnishing the yacht ‘Petrel. ” The amount of the complainant’s claim is $60.93 and interest. When the case came on for hearing before the circuit judge, a motion was made by the defendant to dismiss the proceedings for want of jurisdiction, on the ground that, the amount involved being less than *529$100, there was no jurisdiction in the circuit court to try the case. This motion was granted, and the ruling on that motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Milroy v. Spurr Mountain Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Dewey v. DuyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kates v. ReadingMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Detroit Lumber Co. v. Auxiliary Yacht "Petrel"Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Detroit Lumber Co. v. Auxiliary Yacht "Petrel."Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Morley v. University of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API