Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Taylor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1863PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Certiorari to a circuit court commissioner for tbe county of Wayne.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell J.:

Taylor having recovered a judgment of restitution against Farrell, as holding over after a mortgage foreclosure (the .proceeding having been had under the statute giving a, summary’ remedy in such cases), a certiorari was issued to the circuit court commissioner, to review his action.

We intimated upon the argument a doubt whether the writ ought to be retained for such a purpose, and, upon further consideration, are satisfied that it should be quashed, as improvidently issued.

It was claimed on. the argument, that the allowance of the writ by a proper officer is conclusive up on.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re LantisMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Storm v. OdellNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  3. Sallee v. IrelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Comstock v. PorterNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  5. People v. FarwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Baker v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Alabama Great Southern R. R. v. ChristianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  3. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. HuntMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. City of Ishpeming v. MaroneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. People ex rel. Roediger v. Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API