Legal Opinion

City of Ishpeming v. Maroney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1882PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Certiorari to justice of the peace.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

While it would seem quite clear that the •charge upon which the respondent was arrested was not criminal in its character and that she could not therefore be imprisoned, yet there would seem to be two objections to the present remedy.

First. The fine was voluntarily paid by a third person •and respondent released before any application was made for the writ. We are asked, therefore, to set aside and hold for naught a satisfied judgment, and the necessity for so doing is not apparent. Powell v. People 47 Mich. 108.

Secondly, a remedy by certiorari and also by appeal to the circuit court was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Farrell v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Powell v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Dunlap v. Toledo, Ann Arbor & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. MalloryMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Ideal Furnace Co. v. International Molders' Union of North AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. McCarthy v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Thomas v. Montcalm Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. In re PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API