Legal Opinion

(PC) Barnes v. Van Ness

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 4, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00625Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00625-NONE-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER FOLLOWING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 13 v. 14 VAN NESS, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Antoine Barnes (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 18 this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 1, 2021, the Court held 19 an Initial Scheduling Conference (“Conference”). Plaintiff telephonically appeared on his own 20 behalf. Counsel James Arendt telephonically appeared on behalf of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Charles M. Keenan v. Frank Hall, Director Oregon Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Delgado-SanchezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  3. Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API