Legal Opinion

Charles M. Keenan v. Frank Hall, Director Oregon Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 11, 1998No. 94-35726PublishedCited by 367 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REJECTING EN BANC REQUEST

ORDER

The opinion, Slip op. 5571, filed May 8, 1996 [83 F.3d 1083] is amended as follows: add a footnote to “major difference between the conditions for the general prison population and the segregated population” in line 2 on page 5578 [83 F.3d at 1089] of the Slip op.: “The Court expressed it thusly: ‘Based on a comparison between inmates inside and outside disciplinary segregation, the State’s actions in placing [Sandin] there for 30 days did not work a major disruption in his environment.’ Sandin at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

3Cited by367 opinions

  1. Michael Hayes v. Idaho Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Miriam Mendiola-Martinez v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Emmeth Sealey v. T.H. GiltnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. Nick Mangiaracina v. Paul PenzoneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Rezaq v. NalleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

362 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API