Legal Opinion
Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 8, 1996No. 94-35726PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
83 F.3d 1083
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3261, 96 Daily Journal
D.A.R. 5331
Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, et
al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-35726.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Oct. 19, 1995.
Decided May 8, 1996.
Steven B. Berlin, Kenneth B. Stratton, Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff, Tichy & Mathiason, San Francisco, California, for plaintiff-appellant.
Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, Oregon, for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Michael Hayes v. Idaho Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Nick Mangiaracina v. Paul PenzoneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Christopher Jones v. Dwight NevenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- (BIVENS) Hodges v. MatevousianDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (PC) Barnes v. Van NessDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.