Legal Opinion
Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 27, 2006No. Nos. 4582-79 L, 4583-79 L, 4592-70 L, 4593-79 LPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
Before the court is Tribes’ Motion for Leave to Amend Petitions (Pis.’ Mot. or Motion), Defendant’s Response to Tribes’ Motion for Leave to Amend Petitions (Def.’s Resp.), and Tribes’ Reply Memorandum Re Motion to Amend Petitions (Pis.’ Reply). The Motion and responsive briefs were filed *173simultaneously in subdockets 4582-79L/4592-79L and 4583-79L/4593-79L.1
I. Background
This case was filed in 1979 by the Eastern Shoshone and the Northern Arapaho Tribes (collectively, the Tribes), both resident on and owners of an undivided half interest in the Wind River…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Allan J. Jablonski v. Pan American World Airways, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Navajo NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Mitsui Foods, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Te-Moak Bands of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Meyer Group, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Normandy Apartments, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Oenga v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.