Legal Opinion
Normandy Apartments, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 2, 2011No. 10-51CPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge:
The plaintiff in this action is a property owner that participated in a subsidized housing program run by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In exchange for rent subsidies and other benefits, plaintiff agreed to maintain its property in a decent, safe, and sanitary manner. The contract in which it made this promise — a Housing Assistance Payment contract (HAP contract) — provided that the failure to maintain and operate the property would be an event of default that could result in the suspension or cancellation of payments. In fact, upon finding that…
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Norman Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital Allegheny County Jail Camp Hill Prison United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fredericksburg Non-Profit Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Ishler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Hicks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Threshold Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Aviation Software, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.