Legal Opinion
Bannum, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 23, 2008No. 01-639CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
Bannum, Inc. (“Bannum”) filed a ten-count complaint in this court seeking equitable adjustments and other remedies respecting contracts it has and has had with the Bureau of Prisons (“Bureau” or “BOP”). Bannum operates residential Community Correctional Centers (“Centers”) for federal offenders, both male and female, at various locations for the Bureau.1 The ten counts in Bannum’s initial complaint related to sixteen contracts regarding fifteen different Centers operated for the Bureau. At this juncture in the case, nine of the ten counts are still in dispute.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Galen Medical Associates, Inc. v. United States, and Deborah Downing Md, PllcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Dekatron Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Baistar Mechanical, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- White Buffalo Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- White Buffalo Construction, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.