Legal Opinion

Gerald Charles Souch v. Don Schaivo, Deputy Warden

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 30, 2002No. 01-15487PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge.

We must decide whether a state trial court violated the Ex Post Facto Clause by determining that the sentences on multiple counts of conviction would run consecutively, rather than concurrently, under a state statute not yet in effect when the underlying crimes were committed.

I

This case arises out of habeas petitioner Gerald Souch’s conviction in Arizona state court stemming from his activities of June 11, 1986. On that evening, clad in a frilly white dress and nylons, and wearing a white lacy bandana around his head, Souch broke into the house of Susan…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Lewis v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  5. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Robert Lewis Himes v. S. Frank ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Gilbert C. Brown v. Joan Palmateer, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Nelson v. BiterDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
  4. State v. Kamana'oHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. KamanaoHawaii Supreme Court · 2008

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API