Legal Opinion

Hoyt Shoe Co. v. Cuff

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 27, 1915No. 4373PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from County Court, Blaine County; George W. Ferguson, Judge. Action by Hoyt Shoe Company against J. J. Cuff. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

BLEAKMORE, C.

This case was commenced in the county court of Blaine county by the plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, against the defendant in error, as defendant, on an open account for certain shoes sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant. Defendant answered by way of general denial- and pleaded failure of consideration, breach of warranty, damages by reason thereof, etc. There was trial to a jury, resulting in judgment for defendant; and plaintiff has brought the case here for review.

Defendant here objects to the consideration of the brief of plaintiff, and moves an affirmance of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. School Dist. No. 38, Le Flore County v. School Dist. No. 92, Le Flore CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Worrell v. FellowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Moore v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. James v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API