Legal Opinion
Moore v. Adams
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 4, 1913No. 3477PublishedCited by 3 opinions
(Syllabus by the Court.) Error from County Court, Harmon County; C. W. King, Judge. Action by W. N. Adams against A. A. Moore. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Per curiam
This cause comes on to be heard on motion of defendant in error to affirm the judgment of the trial court. There judgment was rendered against plaintiff in error for a certain sum, whereupon he superseded the same and commenced proceeding in error in this court. As counsel for plaintiff in error has not complied with that part of our rule 25 (38 Okla. x, 95 Pac. viii) which requires:
“The brief of the plaintiff in error in all cases except felonies shall contain an abstract or abridgment of the transcript, setting forth the material parts of the pleadings, proceedings, facts and documents upon…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McKain v. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Merchants' Planters' Ins. Co. v. CraneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Berry v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hoyt Shoe Co. v. CuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Oriental Cement Plaster Co. v. Roman Nose Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Tulsa Mid-Continent Oil & Gas Co. v. E. E. Tuttle & SonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916