Legal Opinion

Wing v. Mollett

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 12, 1924No. 24,881PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The action was one for the specific performance of a contract for the purchase of real property and for $1,000 dam*117ages for failure of the defendant to comply with the contract. A demurrer to plaintiffs petition was sustained and plaintiff appeals.

The contract reads:

“Sept. 18, 1922, Arkansas City, Kansas.
“Part payment $3800.00 on propei-ty 810 No. 5th Street. Balance to be paid as follows $800 cash and assume a note of $500 held by Charley Wing. Balance to be paid in the building and loan or to be paid in monthly payments not to exceed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Broadway Hospital & Sanitarium v. DeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. King v. StephensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Hampe v. SageSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Ross v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Walton v. Piqua State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  2. Botkin v. Security State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. Clark v. LarkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. Nichols v. CoppockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Cassity v. CassitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API