Legal Opinion

Cassity v. Cassity

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1938No. 33,715PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was a partition suit. Defendants appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to a certain paragraph of their answer.

The two plaintiffs claim title through a quitclaim deed and contend they are together the owners of an equal undivided one-sixth remainder interest. Defendants represent the remaining five-sixths interest in the land, and urge the interest of plaintiffs is subject to an equitable lien created by an oral agreement.

The answer admitted the following facts contained in plaintiffs’ first cause of action, to wit: J. R. Cassity…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. Stahl v. StevensonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. First National Bank v. LightnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Henshaw v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Dubbs v. HaworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Augusta Bank & Trust v. BroomfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. Walton v. Piqua State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  3. Schnug v. SchnugSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Ed Dewitte Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Fin. Assocs. Midwest, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  5. In Re Estate of HargreavesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API