Keith v. Keith

MAUS, Judge.

This is an action to partition 159.5 acres, more or less, in Laclede County. The trial court found the plaintiff owned 3¾2 and the defendants owned 4/⅛ undivided interests in the entire tract and ordered partition by sale. A sale was conducted and the report of sale was filed and approved. The defendants’ initial point on appeal is that the trial court erred in not determining their interests in the “northern portion” of the property to be ⅛ rather than V42.

The entire property is described as Lots 9, 10, 11, 14 and 15 in Section 19, Township 35, Range 17, except one acre out of…