Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Kinnick

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 1981No. 12027PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In this dissolution of marriage action betwixt petitioner Colleen and respondent John, the trial court requested briefs containing, inter alia, suggestions as to the division of marital property. Regarding 80 acres of real estate in Dade County, Colleen’s attorney wrote: “[I]t is the contention of Petitioner that the eighty acre tract of land is marital property .... It is Petitioner’s contention that this property should be set apart to Respondent, that Respondent should be required to make all outstanding payments due and owing on said property, and that Respondent should further be…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nelson v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Benjamin v. BenjaminMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Hay v. HamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Rogers Ex Rel. Rogers v. Toro Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Clark v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bond v. California Compensation & Fire Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Shaffer v. Terrydale Management Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Hankins Construction Co. v. Missouri Insurance Guaranty Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Weast v. WeastMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API