Legal Opinion
Plant v. Plant
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 18, 1992No. 17480PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARRISH, Judge.
Respondent (Sheila) brought an action for partition of certain real estate situate in Barry County, Missouri, that she and appellant (Robert), her former husband, owned as tenants in common. The trial court entered an Interlocutory Judgment in Partition that included a finding that the property could not be divided in kind and an order for the sale of the real estate. Rule 96.19. The order of sale directed the Sheriff of Barry County to conduct the sale. The sheriff caused a notice of sale to be published as required by Rule 96.21 and on December 28, 1991, sold the real estate.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Albert J. Hoppe, Inc. v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Bentlage v. SpringgateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Swift v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- McKeehan v. SimmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997