Legal Opinion

Heintz v. Hudkins

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1992No. 17611PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROW, Judge.

A joint tenant of real estate sought partition of it. The trial court entered “Judgment” ordering the property sold and specifying how the net proceeds should be divided. The suing party died before the sale could be held. The trial court ruled the death rendered the suit moot, and dismissed it. That ruling is the subject of this appeal. The pertinent facts follow.1

By his second amended petition, John G. Bock (“Bock”) averred he and Defendants Gene F. Hudkins (“Gene”) and Janet Hud-*141kins (“Janet”) were “seized as joint tenants” of a tract of land. Bock pled his share was one-half…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Penhallow v. Doane's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1795
  2. Spitcaufsky v. HattenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  3. In Re Gerling's EstateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  4. In Re Estate of KingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Lee's Summit Building & Loan Ass'n v. CrossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Green EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Clark v. DadyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Burkholder Ex Rel. Burkholder v. BurkholderSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  4. Central Bank of Kansas City v. CostanzoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Food Services Corp. v. RheamMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API