Legal Opinion

Tyler v. . Mahoney

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1915PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Bond, J., at November Term, 1913, of Beetle.

1Opinion of the Court

ClaeK, 0. J.

This is an action to recover damages to bis crops by an attachment levied in an action brought by tbe defendants against tbe plaintiff in 1903.' That action was before this Court, Mahoney v. Tyler, 136 N. C., 40, when it was held that though the attachment had been wrongfully sued out, the defendant in that case could not recover damages therein, but must bring an independent action for that purpose. That was done by this action, which was before this Court, Mahoney v. Tyler, 166 N. C., 509. This Court held therein that it was not necessary to prove malice in order to recover…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Railroad Co. v. Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. R. R. v. . Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Sneeden v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  5. Allen v. . GreenleeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1830

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. Guaranty Estates Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Shute v. . ShuteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. Flowers v. SpearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Marshall v. Estate of ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Flowers v. . SpearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API