R. R. v. . Hardware Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1ConcurrenceConnor, J.
When this case was before this Court at Spring Term, 1904, it was decided that there was a misjoinder of causes of action. 135 N.C. 73. The plaintiff is now proceeding against the defendant company, not upon attachment bond, but under the principles of the common law, to recover damages for such alleged unlawful seizure. The defendant demurs to the new complaint, filed as a consequence of the former decision of the Court, upon the following (176) grounds: (1) The complaint does not allege the institution of the suit or proceedings by the defendant against the plaintiff without probable cause;…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Sneeden v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Kirkham v. . Coe and CauseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1854
- Williams v. . HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1825
3Cited by23 opinions
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Bickel v. MacKieDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1978
- Dickerson v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- O'TOOLE v. FranklinOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Melton v. RickmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.