Legal Opinion
Boehm v. Premier Insurance
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided March 28, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreco, J.
Dr. Ian J. Boehm (“Boehm”), a chiropractor, alleged that the defendant insurance company (“Premier”) violated the Consumer Protection Act, G.L.c. 93A, by committing an unfair settlement practice in violation of G.L.c. 176D, §3(9) in failing to make timely payments of personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits under G.L.c. 90, §34M. On appeal, Boehm assigns as error the denial of various requests for rulings of law he filed.
Diane LeBlanc (“LeBlanc”), Boehm’s patient and Premier’s insured, had two accidents in fairly quick succession; the first one occurred on March 15,1999 and the second on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Doe v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Fascione v. CNA Insurance CompaniesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Transamerica Insurance Group v. Turner Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- O'Leary-Alison v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Adams v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Provenzano v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
- Salafia v. Hanover InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006